Honestly I wouldn't call 16% rise in 9 years that
large difference. It makes sense if you ask me. People are living
longer than before so of course there are more people to go and watch
movies. Whole article seemed quite narrow minded to me. It said that
when they were trying to get young people to see movies they just
added more special effects and action in to it. And now that young
people are "stealing" movies from internet they are not
going to see movies anymore.
I would like to think that they are not
going to see those movies because the tickets cost way too much and
producers are underestimating their audience. No matter how cool your
explosion is if I see it ten times in one minute. I will start waiting for
something else. And when I realize there is nothing new or even
partly interesting coming I won't be coming back. Not if the film is from
the same production team.
Studios keep spending way too much money on effects and then forgets
the script. Sure older people are easy way to get money with just
some drama but how about if you made actually a good movie with good
characters and a plot? And throw some nice effects in in. That way
you could get old and young together. Only thing different with old
and young is that old people are not stupid enough to pay money for a
movie without story and young people just want to get away for a
while. We are not going to bay 12 bucks so we can try to concentrate
on some super long speech, at least when you are watching pointless
action and explosions it feels like your brains are on vacation.
I think the whole article stereotyped all audiences.
Old people are not boring and young are not stupid.
Agreed, even some movies with No effects or with effects that would make someone cry can be great movies! It's like the age fight whats best? Story or graphics? at least in games I consider story to be most important, so why not Hollywood? Also the remaking all the movies that we have seen before and changin them a bit. why not make something new?
ReplyDelete